I like lists just about as much as I like statistics. That’s saying a lot.This week we saw the release of two new “lists” – The Top 500 Most Valuable Brands and the 25 Companies with the Best Customer Service.
Do you think pharmaceutical companies or their brands were included on either list? Read on …
Brand Finance, a UK based brand valuation company, released this list of Top 500 most valuable global brands. Retail giant Walmart retained the top spot, with Google at #2. Several major pharmaceutical companies did indeed make the list, including:
- Johnson & Johnson (#85)
- Pfizer (#131)
- Merck (#150)
- Sanofi-aventis (#161)
- Abbott (#169)
- AstraZeneca (#222)
- Lilly (#264)
- Schering-Plough (#343)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (#347)
- Baxter (#468)
Only the parent, corporate entities were mentioned among the strongest of global brands. Certainly many of these pharmaceutical company names – or some iteration of them - go way back in the global history of science and medicine. But often pharma product brands don’t have the same name around the world, and due to patent laws, they just can’t enjoy that longevity. They also just don’t have the reach of a brand like McDonald’s or Disney. Because while just about everyone has eaten at McDonald’s at some point in their life or seen a Disney movie, not everyone is taking the same medication for the same illness.
For example, Claritin has been a consumer brand for years – it was one of the first to be advertised directly to consumers – and still lives today as an over-the-counter entity. But with apologies to Schering-Plough, Claritin will just never be a Coca-Cola.
By the way, here are the top 20 (global) brands that did make the list:
- Walmart
- Coca-Cola
- IBM
- Microsoft
- GE
- Vodafone
- HSBC
- HP
- Toyota
- AT&T
- Santander
- Verizon
- WELLS FARGO
- Budweiser
- Tesco
- McDonald’s
- Walt Disney
- Apple
- Nokia
Sadly, but perhaps not surprisingly, no pharma companies made this list. It is a little unfair because in the grand scheme of things, pharma companies have done a lot of good and “service” over the years, providing life-saving, pain-easing, symptom-relieving medications. That said, the past weeks’ news about Avandia and the asthma drugs hasn’t helped Big Pharma’s reputation.
Is it time pharmaceutical companies stepped up and truly focused on the customer and their needs beyond the popping of a pill? For example, there is an opportunity to:
- Open the door for feedback from customers – both patients and HCPs. Go ahead and put that open text box on the brand Web site. Open up the lines of a live chat window. No doubt patients will provide their accolades, their stories, their complaints, their questions, and yes – maybe an occasional adverse event or two. But opening up the lines of communications will work toward fixing the current dysfunctional relationship between consumers and pharma companies.
- Help consumers pay for their meds. I’ve posted in the past about how pharma companies can help consumers during the recession. See those suggestions here.
- Help consumers with their conditions, and help them stay on their meds. Many companies are already doing this through patient support and compliance/adherence programs. And many companies are spending TONS of money to develop these programs, and yet enrollment stays flat. Companies should swing the focus to what truly benefits the patient first– not the company – and work harder to let patients know about the availability and benefits of these programs,
So here’s the list of top 25 customer-service-focused companies, courtesy of BusinessWeek:
1. AMAZON.COM
2. USAA
3. JAGUAR
4. LEXUS
5. THE RITZ-CARLTON
6. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS
7. ZAPPOS.COM
8. HEWLETT-PACKARD
9. T. ROWE PRICE
10. ACE HARDWARE
11. KEYBANK
12. FOUR SEASONS HOTELS & RESORTS
13. NORDSTROM
14. CADILLAC
15. AMICA
16. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR
17. AMERICAN EXPRESS
18. TRADER JOE'S
19. JETBLUE AIRWAYS
20. APPLE
21. CHARLES SCHWAB
22. BMW
23. TRUE VALUE
24. L.L. BEAN
25. JW MARRIOTT
Sorry pharma. Maybe next time.
4 comments:
Seems that the auto industry (cars and rentals) is doing a much better job with their customer-service image compared to pharma. Is it because they have to deal with greater competition??
Great post. Your points are interesting and as you say not surprising. In an industry where brands have limited "lives" in market, it doesn't surprise me that corporate brands always exceed tangible brands.
On the service side, I'm not sure it's possible in today's climate for an industry so vilified in the press to score highly regardless of the reality of the service itself.
Thank you both for your comments!
Interesting point Salil - there is probably something to that. Also, while some airlines on the list have "figured out" the customer service thing, I expect if there were a list of the worst customer service co.'s, other airlines would be on that one too.
Mike - you're right. Even if pharma really was doing an amazing job at customer service, their reputation would likely preceed them and they'd continue to score low marks.
It would be interesting to see how each of these big names rank on Digital IQ. We have a digital IQ report coming out in a few weeks. Follow me @L2_Pharma so we can let you know when it's out and you can compare!
-Stephanie
Follow me @L2_Pharma!
Post a Comment